Posts Tagged ‘evaluation’

  • Wed, Nov 10 2010

    Most Popular

    By jess at 8:10 pm

    Let’s be real. Popularity is a bit of a joke. What is “popular” anyway? Most of the “popular” people we knew in high school sucked.

    But we digress.

    You’ll notice that the default idea evaluation sort was changed from “Most Comments” to “Most Popular” earlier today.

    To prevent attempts to “game” this new sort function, we’re keeping the exact ingredients of what makes an idea “popular” a secret. Just know that we’ve been listening to the conversations taking place on Get Satisfaction and on the forums, and we’ve studied other popularity algorithms in existence (Google the subject for more; it’s actually quite fascinating).

    Our algorithm weighs a number of factors in a way that should continuously surface ideas that are interesting and worth further evaluation. As with everything on Quirky, we’ll continue to evolve this and other site features constantly. So let us know what you think on the forum!

  • Mon, Nov 1 2010

    The days of figuring out where you’re gonna assign your 3 votes in Quirky Product Evaluation are over.

    Starting today, you’ll be given unlimited votes for the Product Evaluation phase. Woohoo!

    However, there is a caveat: the amount of influence you can earn from voting is directly tied to how many votes you cast.

    What does this mean? Well, say you vote for a winning idea. You’ll receive more influence if you only voted for two ideas in the round and less influence if you voted for 20.

    Moral of the story? Use your votes wisely! We’re counting on you to bubble up the best ideas each week. With great power comes great responsibility. Do us proud.

  • Fri, Oct 29 2010

    Rating, Schmating

    By jess at 12:32 pm

    Starting today, there will no longer be rating for Industrial Design, Naming, Tagline, Logo, and other non-evaluation projects.

    This change will go into effect after the Product 61 naming project closes out.

    You will still be able to rate ideas in Product Evaluation phase — and you’re encouraged to!

    There are a couple of reasons why we’re making this change for non-eval projects:

    - As many of you have told us (quite loudly!) rating for these projects was a major time-suck, especially as the number of submissions continues to grow.

    - Because fewer people were rating, we weren’t receiving as much useful, conclusive data.

    - We want you to be able to focus your efforts on finding and pushing forward the best names and taglines through your votes.

    That’s all, folks! Feel free to hit us back with questions and comments on our community-powered support forum powered by Get Satisfaction.

  • Fri, Sep 24 2010

    When we read Tracie Beer’s idea submission for “the halter hanger” we couldn’t contain ourselves. Finally, an elegant solution for a widespread problem!

    As to be expected, the idea resonated with all the gals in the room – I know I’ll commit to at least 10 – but the guys were maybe even more jazzed. Gaz got excited about the design potential and the possibility of turning this into a unisex hanger. Ben wanted to give it a 100 on viability (don’t worry, we didn’t let him). Chad let out a girlish squeal at one point in the conversation.

    And it seemed like the community loved this idea as well. Not only did you guys give it the highest “Likeliness to Purchase” rating, but you also said the following:

    “I think this is brilliant and could make threshold in minutes if priced right.”

    “Makes the most sense out of all the ideas this week.”

    “I can’t believe that this doesn’t exist yet! Every woman needs at least 20 of these in their closets!”

    “It looks like the bat signal from Batman. It’ll get the superhero demographic as well. Hanging those capes is a real challenge!”

    So that’s why, although this idea ranked sixth in idea submissions, it received a unanimous “wild card” staff vote for this week. That, combined with the large gap between males and females who voted in this round, pushed this idea to the top of our list. We’ve reserved the right to select a “wild card” winner when we see something that really grabs our attention and sparks discussion, which this product idea more than accomplished.

    But really, we just want to break into that superhero market. ;)

    Congrats to newbie ideator Tracie for a winner!

  • Mon, Aug 2 2010

    Evaluation for product 0054 just launched. You may have noticed some sweet changes to the page format…

    And it doesn’t stop there. Ben went into more detail on the new submission/evaluation format a few weeks ago, but I wanted to lay out how exactly these changes will affect our/your weekly schedule.

    MONDAY 11am(ish) EST   idea submission ends, community evaluation launches

    TUESDAY all day   community evaluation

    WEDNESDAY 12noon EST   community evaluation ends, staff evaluation launches

    THURSDAY all day   staff evaluation, deep dive on top ideas

    FRIDAY 3pm(ish) EST   model shop meeting to determine the week’s winner, announcement of Quirky’s next product

    THE WEEKEND tweak ideas for resubmission, treat symptoms of Quirky withdrawal, etc.

    Put simply, you guys will get two days to vote, rate, and comment on the ideas up for eval. Then, our staff will spend time doing a deep dive on the top-voted ideas to identify design potential, market potential, and viability. Each submission will get a score, and those scores will go public once the round ends.

    We good? Good. Now back to voting!

  • Tue, Jul 20 2010

    July already?  Time is FLYING.

    As we promised back at our first town meeting in April, big changes to the way products are submitted, rated, and evaluated are due to roll out this month.

    I’d like to re-iterate the goals behind these changes:

    1. Provide increased transparency to inventors/ideators as to how their idea did
    2. Simplify/clarify our rating criteria to be more useful/self explanatory
    3. Make the submission process more “Question/Answer” based vs. “Title/Description”
    4. Allow us to better bubble up ideas, and get smarter about the way products are chosen.

    A good portion of our time over the past few months has been devoted to boiling down the product submission/evaluation process to its core, doing dry runs with different rating/voting procedures internally, and working to create a flow which will make the process delightful for all stakeholders.

    So here’s the plan (and a sneak peek of what’s not too far away):

    1. You may have notice Product 0053 has not yet been moved into evaluation. Reason being: we plan to push the first batch of these changes in the next day or two, and would like to wait until that’s done to have voting begin on 53.
    2. Product 0054 will be  the first product for which ideas are taken in the NEW FORMAT (details below).
    3. While product 0053 will carry the newly designed voting/rating mechanisms, Product 0054 will be the first product for which a “0-100″ score will be provided.

    Product Submission:

    Beginning with Product 54, product ideas will be submitted with a 140 character description of your product.  You’ll have to categorize your submission into one of the following, and answer the corresponding questions:

    Kitchen, Organization, Fitness, Home/Decor, Accessories, Lawn & Garden, Electronics:

    Describe Your Problem, Describe Your Solution, Key Features (bullet points), Similar Products/Inspiration

    Home Decor, Toys, Pets, Other:

    Describe Your Customer, Describe Your Product, Key Features (bullet points), Similar Products/Inspiration

    You’ll be given a preview of your idea in the format it will look when the world feasts its eyes on it, and then you’ll be asked to pony up your 99. Soon, you’ll also be able to save drafts, and edit a product at any time prior to the time evaluation on that idea begins.

    Here’s a sneak peek:

    Product Evaluation:

    Rating  & Voting:

    For the time being, voting will remain as 3 votes per member per product evaluation round. However the rating criteria will be switched to:

    1. Uniqueness
    2. Usefulness
    3. Wow Factor
    4. Likeliness to Purchase

    Voting & rating will no longer occur on the “product evaluation” page.  Instead, every idea will carry its very own URL & page so that you can directly link friends & followers to your submission.

    When you click on an evaluation project, you will see the countdown clock, along with a list of all of the 140 character descriptions of the idea, all which are clickable and will bring you to the “idea detail” page where you can vote, comment, and tab forward/next through that week’s submssions.

    Comments:

    One thing we have all observed since the launch of Quirky is how powerful/productive comment threads on the initial ideas can be.

    For this reason, we will also be introducing categorized comments beginning with the evaluation of product 53. When you make a comment on a product, you will be asked to classify as:

    General, Features, Inspiration & Competition, or Attachments & Assets

    Just imagine seeing an idea and thinking “that exists already” you can sort the comments by competition and see what other members are saying about the competitive landscape, instead of reading through all 238 comments in the thread.

    Scores & Decisions:

    As I stated above, all ideas beginning with  those submitted into Product 0054 will receive a 0-100 score:

    Up to 50 Points: based upon community reaction (votes/comments/ratings):

    The top 25% of the community reacted ideas will then move into the hopper for the staff to evaluate. Ideas that are not in the top 25% based upon community reaction will not be evaluated by our staff. The final score on these ideas will just be a reflection of the community reaction.

    Up to 20 Points: based upon Quirky employee & retail partner reaction (votes/ratings that will occur internally):

    A “deep dive” will then be done on the top 5 ideas (based upon score after community & employee input). Ideas that are not one of the top five will receive their final score, which will just be the addition of the community points, plus the internal points.

    The “deep dive” on the top 5 will look at 3 major areas:

    Up to 10 Points: based upon “Design Potential”:

    How much potential does this product have to WOW?

    Do we feel this idea provides us with the opportunity to design something distinctive so we can stand out from the market?

    Up to 10 Points: based upon “Viability”:

    Could we price at a competitive level while still maintaining the margin we need to pay the community, expenses, etc?

    Intellectual Property / Uniqueness Concerns? (input from our legal team)

    Up to 10 Points: based upon “Market Potential”:

    What is the market potential for indirect sales? (input from our retail partners around the world)

    What is the potential for direct sales? (input from our SEO/SEM team)

    Once all the scoring is complete, the winner will be announced (the winner will now always be the top scored idea), and all ideas will carry a 0-100 score next to them.  Depending upon how far each idea got in the evaluation process, you’ll be able to see how many points it recieved in each one of the above 5 areas.

    As you’ll see, only the top 5 ideas are going to be eligible for the full 100 points.

    Sneak peek of the product detail page with the final point allocation: